Magic-Users & Crossbows

[outlander78]

Magic-users can use slings, not crossbows, and even that is an option - the initial rule is daggers only. (I've always wondered why not staves, but that's another topic, and probably one done to death a decade ago ...)

The slings rule is clearly for game balance, because crossbows are much easier to operate. Balance aside, I have trouble with the idea of a klutzy MU twirling a sling whilst unable to understand the complexities of a point-and-shoot weapon.

So - what would be a good trade-off if an MU wants to use a light crossbow? (Strength is a good excuse to block heavy ones.) I was thinking of disallowing XP bonuses for high intelligence - advancing 5% or 10% slower seems reasonable - but I would like to hear your thoughts, as I bet you have much better ideas.

Thanks.

[sgtslag]

This was done as part of the "game balance" lunacy.  It makes absolutely no sense, common, or otherwise.  In the modern day, most US States restrict the use of X-bows for hunting game animals, explicitly because it is sooo easy to use, and so deadly -- modern, compound X-bows, that is.  In medieval times, the Papacy even outlawed their use in warfare, as it was too effective, too easy, too deadly!  I believe Gary tried to use a "Disintegrate Spell" on that bit of history, but it made its Saving Throw, and so we still know about it.   

A Sling is an under-valued weapon, IMO, but I play 2e rules, so I don't know what its stat's are in any other version.  It has great Range, and with a lead Bullet, it does a fair amount of Damage when it hits.  The ROF is slow, but it is still a decent, bludgeoning weapon, with excellent range.

As to the X-bow for a Wizard, I say, "Run with it -- it's your game, your rules!"  If you find that it breaks the game balance, change it.  I do not believe it will 'break' your game, in any way.  Aside from all of that, look at what Gary did for the Wizard class, in the 1e Advanced Dungeons & Dragons rules...  Cheers!

[outlander78]

Thanks!